Key result
Low-volume CEA centers are linked to ~23% higher 30-day stroke or death risk than high-volume centers.
Why the study?
With declining surgical volumes for symptomatic carotid stenosis, the study aimed to compare CEA outcomes between high-volume and low-volume centers and identify an optimal volume threshold.
Does performing carotid endarterectomy at high volume centers reduce the rate of stroke or death in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis?
Cohort (n=12,169)
Yes
Does performing carotid endarterectomy at high volume centers reduce the rate of stroke or death in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Higher hospital volume for carotid endarterectomy is associated with a lower rate of 30-day stroke or death, supporting the potential reorganization and centralization of carotid surgery services.
OBJECTIVES: In several European countries, declining volumes of surgery for symptomatic carotid stenosis have been reported, likely as a consequence of reduced smoking rates and improved medical therapy. In Sweden, 21 centers are performing carotid endarterectomy (CEA), 5 of them performing nearly 50% of the total volume. The aim of the present study was to compare outcome after CEA in high volume and low volume centers and to see whether there is an optimal volume threshold. METHODS: Registry based study on all patients treated with CEA (n=12169) for symptomatic carotid stenosis during the period July 2008 - December 31 2023. All centres were analysed separately, and also dichotomised if performing more than 50 CEAs annually (high volume centers) or less than 50 procedures (low volume centres). Multivariable logistic regression models were used to assess independent predictors of ipsilateral and contralateral stroke, while Cox proportional hazards models were employed for death and stroke-or-death outcomes, accounting for patient-level covariates and centre effects. Sensitivity analyses: exclusion of smallest centers, alternative thresholds and stratification for early and late study periods where performed. RESULTS: In the crude analysis, stroke or death was more frequent in the low volume group, occurring in 4.48% of cases (95% CI 3.98-5.03) compared to 3.62% (95% CI 3.17-4.13) in the high-volume group (p = 0.018) After adjusting for differences in comorbidities and demographic data, low volume centres demonstrated significantly higher odds of stroke or death within 30 days after CEA with a hazard ratio of 1.23 (95% CI: 1.03-1.47, p = 0.023) CONCLUSIONS: There is an inverse relationship between hospital volume and the rate of stroke or death following carotid endarterectomy in Sweden. Reorganisation of carotid surgery services should be considered.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Öjersjö et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in symptomatic carotid stenosis (n=12,169). Low hospital volume (<50 procedures annually) vs. High hospital volume (>50 procedures annually) was evaluated on stroke or death within 30 days after CEA (HR 1.23, 95% CI 1.03-1.47, p=0.023). Low hospital volume (<50 procedures/year) was associated with a higher risk of 30-day stroke or death after carotid endarterectomy compared to high volume centers (HR 1.23; 95% CI 1.03-1.47).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: