PURPOSE: to establish reference values for ultrasound shear-wave elastography for pericranial muscles in healthy individuals (m. trapezius, m. splenius capitis, m. semispinalis capitis, m. sternocleidomastoideus and m. masseter). Also to evaluate day-to-day variations in the shear-wave speeds and evaluate the effect of the pennation of the muscle fibers, ie scanning parallel or perpendicularly to the fibers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 10 healthy individuals (5 males and 5 females) had their pericranial muscles examined with shear-wave elastography in two orthogonal planes on two different days for their dominant and non-dominant side. Mean shear wave speeds from 5 ROI's in each muscle, for each scan plane for the dominant and non-dominant side for the two days were calculated. The effect of the different parameters - muscle pennation, gender, dominant vs non-dominant side and day was evaluated. RESULTS: The effect of scan plane in relation to muscle pennation was statistically significant (p<0.0001). The mean shear-wave speed when scanning parallel to the muscle fibers was significantly higher than the mean shear-wave speed when scanning perpendicularly to the fibers. The day-to-day variation was statistically significant (p=0.0258), but not clinically relevant. Shear-wave speeds differed significantly between muscles. Mean shear wave speeds (m/s) for the muscles in the parallel plane were: for masseter 2.45 (SD:+/-0.25), semispinal 3.36 (SD:+/-0.75), splenius 3.04 (SD:+/-0.65), sternocleidomastoid 2.75 (SD:+/-0.23), trapezius 3.20 (SD:+/-0.27) and trapezius lateral 3.87 (SD:+/-3.87). CONCLUSION: The shear wave speed variation depended on the direction of scanning. Shear wave elastography may be a method to evaluate muscle stiffness in patients suffering from chronic neck pain.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ewertsen et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: