Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Revolutions have provoked not only important social changes and bloody civil wars, but a huge literature. There is controversy and confusion on how to integrate seemingly disparate modes of explanation into a coherent analysis: social structure, the decisions and policies of key actors (be they leaders or organized entities like parties and assemblies), and the choices made by ordinary people. Structural theories have proven useful for describing revolutionary situations; choice theories are useful in clarifying the revolutionary process; how to integrate the two to explain revolutionary outcomes remains contentious.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Oberschall et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: