Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Computational study demonstrates polynomial scaling for Hamiltonian relaxation and precise Riemann zero synthesis, suggesting physical systems can serve as efficient computational substrates.
The exponential growth of Hilbert space dimensions presents a fundamental barrier to the classical simulation of quantum systems, necessitating a paradigm shift from algorithmic simulation to physical instantiation. This study validates the “Inverted Church-Turing-Deutsch” (CTD) framework, which posits that physical Hamiltonian systems can serve as efficient computational substrates for problems intractable to Turing machines. We operationalize this framework through two modalities: “Class A” discrete optimization using Ising models and “Class B” spectral engineering targeting the Riemann zeros. Through rigorous computational validation on synthetic data ($N=3-12$), we demonstrate a decisive scaling divergence: Hamiltonian relaxation exhibits polynomial scaling (T ∝ N2.02), whereas classical brute-force search follows an exponential trajectory (T ∝ 20.55N), supported by a Bayes Factor > 10²⁵. Furthermore, we successfully engineer a 1D physical potential $V(x)$ that reproduces the first five Riemann zeros with a Mean Absolute Percentage Error of 0.033%, effectively functioning as a “Physical Oracle” for number theory. While acknowledging the limitations of synthetic noise models and fabrication challenges, these findings establish a robust theoretical and algorithmic foundation for “Programming the Vacuum,” suggesting that the universe is not merely a simulator but a universal computational engine.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rowan Brad Quni-Gudzinas (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: