Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Behavioral experiments demonstrate stronger transposed-letter effects when letter swaps occur farther from gaze fixation, highlighting the link between letter visibility and orthographic processing.
We examined how Transposed-Letter effects (TL effects: e.g., ASBENT, derived from ABSENT, compared to the substituted-letter [SL] control ALPENT) might vary as a function of the location of the TL effects relative to fixation. The positions of the TL and the initial fixation location (either at position 2 or 5 in 6-letter stimuli) were manipulated in a lexical decision task. Initial fixation remained centered on the screen while stimuli were shifted left or right. Six-letter stimuli were presented in lowercase (Experiment 1) or uppercase (Experiment 2), with critical stimuli being nonwords created by transposing consonants at positions 2–3 or 4–5 and compared with substituted-letter controls. Results showed stronger TL effects when the transpositions occurred farther from fixation. Implications of our findings for current models of letter-position coding are discussed, by emphasizing the important connection between letter visibility (vision) and orthographic processing (reading).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Massol et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: