Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Qualitative multiple-case study reveals key mechanisms for engineering-to-manufacturing BOM transformation in rail manufacturing, highlighting a five-layer reference architecture.
The railway industry value chain, including locomotive manufacturing, maintenance-of-way equipment, and railcar production, operates under intense product complexity, high customization demands, and continuous pressure to reduce delivery timelines. This paper examines how Product Lifecycle Management (PLM)-driven digital thread capabilities support Engineering Bill of Materials (EBOM) to Manufacturing Bill of Materials (MBOM) transformation and closed loop manufacturing (CLM) in railway contexts. A qualitative multiple-case study was conducted across three rail manufacturing organizations through purposive theoretical sampling to represent variation in product type (locomotive, maintenance-of-way, railcar), digital maturity, and geographic location while sharing a common PLM platform foundation. Evidence was drawn from published case documentation, internal system specifications, PLM configuration records, workflow documents, and practitioner knowledge from implementation roles. Within-case analysis was followed by cross-case pattern comparison to identify recurring governance mechanisms, data structures, and deployment patterns. The findings show that governed BOM transformation, manufacturing-specific item types, visualization data pipelines, and phased PLM deployment are key prerequisites for digital thread integrity. The study contributes a five-layer reference architecture derived from cross-case evidence, offering a transferable framework for digital manufacturing transformation in complex discrete manufacturing environments, including rail manufacturing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Prasun Saha (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: