Key result
Electrosurgical energy facilitates septal lead advancement and selective LBB capture, shortening V6 R-wave peak time 17 ms.
Why the study?
Electrosurgical energy may facilitate difficult septal lead advancement during left bundle branch area pacing, but procedural feedback after each application is poorly defined.
Case Report (n=1)
Electrosurgical energy application through a stylet-driven pacing lead can successfully facilitate left bundle branch area pacing when mechanical advancement fails.
Electrosurgical energy may facilitate difficult septal lead advancement during left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP), but procedural feedback after each application is poorly defined. A 63-year-old woman with complete atrioventricular block had persistent left ventricular septal pacing (LVSP) despite deep septal engagement and prolonged mechanical rotation. Two brief 20-W AUTO CUT cycles were delivered through a stylet-driven pacing lead. The first was followed by no meaningful COI or mechanical change. The second was followed by a decrease in COI and renewed lead advancement. Output decrement subsequently demonstrated transition from nonselective to selective LBB capture, with S-V separation of 25 ms and shortening of V6 R-wave peak time from 90 to 73 ms.One-month imaging and electrical parameters remained stable.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Luo et al. (2026) conducted a case report in Complete atrioventricular block (n=1). Electrosurgical energy was evaluated on Selective left bundle branch capture and lead advancement. Electrosurgical energy (20-W) facilitated successful septal lead advancement and selective left bundle branch capture, shortening V6 R-wave peak time from 90 to 73 ms.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: