Is the concept of “global civil society” a Sorelian-type myth that captures intuitively an emergent political project? Or is it, rather, a discursive political terrain open to many interpretations, not all of which might be progressive? A radical democratic content would be one way of filling out the “empty signifier, ” which “global civil society” is, but not the only one.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ronaldo Munck (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: