Simulation study demonstrates optimized latency and energy efficiency in edge computing environments, indicating improved resource allocation and service reliability.
Multi-Access Edge Computing (MEC) has emerged as an effective paradigm for supporting latency-sensitive and computation-intensive applications generated by mobile and IoT devices. However, efficient task scheduling in MEC environments remains challenging due to heterogeneous workloads, limited edge resources, and strict service-level agreement (SLA) requirements. This paper proposes a Hierarchical SLA-Aware Multi-Objective Edge Scheduling (HS-MOES) framework for efficient task allocation in MEC systems. The proposed approach integrates the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and fuzzy inference to perform multi-criteria task prioritization based on execution delay, energy consumption, and SLA violation risk. In addition, a queue-stability-aware scheduling mechanism is introduced to prevent congestion at edge servers, while an SLA-aware cloud migration strategy dynamically redirects tasks when edge resources become insufficient. The performance of the proposed framework is evaluated through large-scale simulations involving 50–200 mobile users and 5–30 edge virtual machines (VMs). HS-MOES is compared with conventional scheduling algorithms (FIFO, RR, SJF) and recent MEC scheduling methods including FAT-ETO, Fuzzy-DRL, and Enhanced Fuzzy Scheduling. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed approach significantly improves system performance. In particular, HS-MOES reduces makespan by up to 24%, average task delay by 19%, and energy consumption per task by 17% compared with existing approaches, while maintaining higher resource utilization and lower SLA violation rates. Statistical analysis over 30 simulation runs with 95% confidence intervals confirms the robustness and stability of the proposed scheduling framework.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lin et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: