Judicial review and social construction: the case of the Turkish Constitutional Court

The Turkish Constitutional Court is often described as an agent of the raison d’etat. Although a number of judgements confirm this assessment, by shifting the focus from result to process the article reveals that judicial decision-making processes in the Turkish Court are more than often contestatory and determined by slim majorities. Modelling judicial decision-making as a process of competitive social construction, the article analyses judgements on constitutionality of surname laws vis-a-vis women. The findings demonstrate that though the ultimate judicial ruling may be tainted by extra-judicial considerations, tight votes signal that today’s dissenters can easily become tomorrow’s majority.