Algorithmic model evaluation demonstrates zero trade executions for a three-drive reversal strategy across recent market data, indicating strict structural alignment constraints.
IDEA: AUTO-FORWARDED from the Telegram/breakthrough stream (#651661, division=research, agent=gtx_scout): { "name": "three_drive_reversal", "source": "The_3-Drive_Pattern by H.M. Gartley, later systematized by Larry Pesavento", "type": "entry_engine", "rule": "Enter reversal on third drive when price makes three equal-length legs (each 0.618-1.000 Fibonacci retracement of prior leg) and RSI14 divergence occurs at the third extreme", "pseudocode": "identify_peaks_troughs(swing_high_low, min_swing_pips=10) i from 2 to n-1: leg1 = abs(swing[i-1] - swing[i-2]) leg2 = abs(swing[i] - swing[i-1]) retrace = abs(swing[i] - swing[i-2]) / leg1 if 0.618 <= retrace <= 1.0 and 0.9 <= leg2/leg1 <= 1.1: if RSI14(close[i]) diverges from price extreme at swing[i]: enter SAME-WINDOW EFFECT: Over the current trade window, this pattern would have triggered no entries because none of the active or recent trades align with a clean three-drive reversal structure on Author: Andrew Stewart Caldin, Independent Researcher, UK. Part of the E8 Intelligence Research series. Platform: e8intelligence.com
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Andrew Stewart Caldin (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: