Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Policy analysis reveals co-presence of market competitiveness and civilisational authority in education governance, indicating market liberalisation does not imply Western convergence.
Critical internationalisation studies have moved beyond Western-centric assumptions, yet analyses of non-Western systems treat global convergence and civilisational assertion as mutually exclusive, obscuring how states pursue both simultaneously. Drawing on legal-policy and regulatory texts, this study analyses India's higher education internationalisation from the 1950s to 2025 and tests three explanations: neoliberal convergence, postcolonial resistance and institutional layering. Each captures part of India's configuration, but none explains the co-presence of developmental and civilisational logics within single instruments. This study introduces developmental civilisationalism, in which the state pursues global competitiveness and asserts civilisational authority through a compatibility layer that renders these agendas mutually constitutive. A four-phase genealogy shows this layer rests on capacities built across seven decades and four political regimes. Regulatory instruments can therefore coordinate market and civilisational agendas within a single governance design, and comparative research should examine instrument architecture rather than assume liberalisation signals convergence with Western models.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Song et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: