Retrospective case-control study reveals age and male sex decrease midpalatal suture separation odds in adults undergoing MARPE, highlighting frontozygomatic separation as a structural biomarker.
Objectives To evaluate demographic, cephalometric, and craniometric biomarker (frontozygomatic separation) predictors of full versus partial midpalatal suture (MPS) separation following 3D-guided piezocorticotomy-assisted MARPE, and characterize separation morphologies. Methods A retrospective case-control study analyzed 108 adults (70 full separation controls; 38 partial separation cases). Separation patterns were categorized (Types 1–5). Multivariable logistic regression assessed biological sex, age, cephalometrics ( ANB , ‐ ‐ SN ‐ ANS ‐ PNS ), PNS-PPW width, and frontozygomatic separation. Model discrimination was evaluated via Area Under the ROC Curve ( AUC ). Linear combinations tested sex-specific age interactions ( < 30 , 30 − 39 , 40 − 58 years). Results Five distinct MPS separation morphologies were identified. Baseline demographic, cephalometric, and post-expansion parameters showed no group differences ( p > 0.05 ). Multivariable regression ( N = 108 , LR χ 2 ( 6 ) = 26.61 , p = 0.0002 , Pseudo R 2 = 0.1900 ) demonstrated that baseline ANB ( p = 0.850 ) and ‐ ‐ SN ‐ ANS ‐ PNS ( p = 0.519 ) did not predict separation. Frontozygomatic separation was a significant positive predictor ( OR = 2.81 , 95 % CI : [ 1.10 , 7.19 ] , p = 0.031 ). Conversely, male sex ( OR = 0.14 , p < 0.001 ) and advancing age ( OR = 0.93 , p = 0.014 ) significantly reduced separation likelihood. Adding the biomarker increased classification accuracy by 2.7 % ( AUC 0.755 → 0.782 ; χ 2 = 1.21 , p = 0.271 ). Stratified analysis revealed age-related declines operated predominantly in males ( n = 44 ), with males aged 40 − 58 demonstrating an 87.3 % odds reduction ( OR = 0.127 , p = 0.024 ), whereas females ( n = 64 ) maintained stable odds ( p > 0.05 ). Conclusions MPS separation manifests in five morphological types. Full separation is uninfluenced by baseline cephalometrics but constrained by male sex and advancing age (precipitously after age 40 in males). Frontozygomatic separation serves as a strong structural predictor.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Koval et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: