Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Theoretical analysis demonstrates that reproductive choice constitutes a categorical imperative and perfect duty, indicating an axiomatic right to abortion grounded in rational agency.
This essay builds a deontological architecture for reproductive choice as a sovereign, natural right grounded in Kant’s metaphysical framework of morality without presupposing fetal personhood. It argues that reproductive choice constitutes a categorical imperative derived from the conditions of rational agency, and therefore rises to the level of a perfect duty properly situated within Officia Juris. It further argues that Kant’s framework provides a comprehensive moral consideration of why a fetus does not qualify as a rational being, and, that the right to abortion is, on that basis, axiomatic.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Asha Yoganandan (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: