Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Multicenter retrospective study reveals improved progression-free survival with targeted therapy in high-grade pulmonary neuroendocrine carcinoma, highlighting value of molecular testing.
Background/Objectives: High-grade pulmonary neuroendocrine carcinoma (HGNEC-L), including SCLC and LCNEC, is aggressive and usually treated according to SCLC paradigms. The clinical relevance of de novo actionable genomic alterations (AGA) remains incompletely defined. Methods: We performed a retrospective multicenter analysis of advanced HGNEC-L with de novo AGA, assessing rwORR, rwDCR, rwPFS, and OS. Findings were contextualized by a structured literature review and exploratory pooled reconstructed-IPD Cox analysis, with targeted therapy modeled as a source-stratified time-dependent covariate. Results: Ten patients from four tertiary centers were included. Most were women (90.0%) and never-smokers (70.0%); histology was LCNEC in 60.0% and SCLC/mixed SCLC in 40.0%. AGA included EGFR mutations (n = 6), EML4-ALK fusions (n = 2), KIF5B-RET fusion (n = 1), and KRAS p.G12C (n = 1). Targeted-containing regimens achieved rwORR 77.8%, rwDCR 88.9%, and median rwPFS 9.0 months (95% CI, 2.0–18.7), as opposed to 3.7 months for ICI-containing regimens and 2.6 months for chemotherapy alone. Median OS for the entire cohort was 17.2 months (95% CI, 4.8–36.3); overall survival did not differ significantly between patients with and without targeted-containing exposure (19.0 vs 17.2 months; log-rank p = 0.50). In pooled reconstructed-IPD time-dependent Cox analysis (72 patients, 39 deaths), targeted therapy showed a favorable but non-significant OS association (HR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.31–2.56; p = 0.831), maintained directionally in the age/sex-adjusted subset (HR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.16–1.77; p = 0.306). Conclusions: De novo AGA-positive HGNEC-L represents a clinically relevant subgroup with potential sensitivity to genotype-matched targeted therapy, supporting comprehensive molecular profiling and early targeted therapy consideration.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Raphael et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: