Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Machine learning study demonstrates high-accuracy prediction and multiobjective optimization of MWCNT nanofluid thermophysical properties, indicating 65 °C maximizes heat transfer efficiency.
This study proposes an integrated methodology that utilizes intelligent computing to precisely predict and optimize the thermophysical properties of a three-dimensional multi-walled carbon nanotube (MWCNT)/water nanofluid. Two distinct Support Vector Regression (SVR) models, enhanced by hyperparameter optimization using a Genetic Algorithm (GA), were successfully trained to accurately estimate the dynamic viscosity (DV) and thermal conductivity (TC) based on experimental data across a range of volume concentrations (0–0.5%) and temperatures (30–65 °C). The resulting SVR-GA models demonstrated high predictive accuracy, evidenced by the test data’s mean and maximum relative percentage errors: 0.4546% and 0.9690% for DV, and 0.5950% and 0.9532% for TC, respectively. Moreover, the trained SVR models have been validated using K-fold cross-validation, and the network’s accuracy in estimating unseen data has been demonstrated. A sensitivity analysis confirmed that temperature exerts a greater influence on nanofluid properties than volume concentration. Leveraging these high-accuracy models, a multiobjective optimization problem was formulated to simultaneously minimize DV and maximize TC. This problem was solved using the Strength Pareto Evolutionary Algorithm 2 (SPEA2), which yielded a Pareto front of optimal trade-off solutions. The analysis of the Pareto front consistently identified 65 °C as the optimal operating temperature, providing useful insights for selecting conditions that maximize the nanofluid’s heat transfer efficiency.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Singh et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: