Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Security analysis demonstrates high-accuracy detection and evasion robustness against tool poisoning in Model Context Protocol servers, highlighting effective defenses for agent metadata.
Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers advertise tools, prompts, and resources to language-model agents through natural-language descriptions that the model reads in full but that clients typically do not render in full to the user. This gap enables tool poisoning: instructions embedded in metadata that steer an agent without the tool's own code ever executing. We present theriac, a static analysis scanner that detects poisoned metadata across all three MCP surfaces using structural co-occurrence rules rather than keyword matching, motivated by the finding that effective poisoning payloads combine a trigger condition, a malicious action, and a plausible justification. We evaluate theriac on three independent axes: recall on a held-out split of the external MCPTox benchmark (45 real servers, 353 tools), which improves from 8.1% to 87.3% across three rule-development iterations without the holdout split ever being tuned against; false-positive rate on eight published MCP servers not involved in development, which remains at zero above low severity across 130 scanned components; and survival of detected attacks under character-level evasion — Cyrillic homoglyphs, invisible Unicode, whitespace padding — which rises from 42% to 100% after a text-normalization pass. We argue that detection recall alone is an incomplete way to evaluate a tool-poisoning scanner, and propose false-positive rate on unmodified real servers and evasion-survival rate as two additional axes future scanners in this space should report alongside it.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ashmith Maddala (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: