Otoacoustic Emissions for Noisy Grown-Ups

No AccessPerspectives on AudiologyArticle1 Jun 2006Otoacoustic Emissions for Noisy Grown-Ups Lynne Marshall, and Judi A. Lapsley Miller Lynne Marshall Naval Submarine Medical Research LaboratoryGroton, CT Google Scholar and Judi A. Lapsley Miller Naval Submarine Medical Research LaboratoryGroton, CT Google Scholar https://doi.org/10.1044/poa2.1.9 SectionsAboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationTrack Citations ShareFacebookTwitterLinked In References Avan, P.,Bonfils, P., & Loth, D. (1996). Effects of acoustic overstimulation on distortion-product and transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions.In A.P. A. AxelssonH. HellstromD. BorchgrevinkR. P. HendersonHamernik, & R Salvi(Eds.), Scientific basis of noise-induced hearing loss(pp. 65–81). New York: Thieme Medical Publishers. Google Scholar Beattie, R. C. (2003). Distortion product otoacoustic emissions: Comparison of sequential versus simultaneous presentation of primary-tone pairs..Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 14(9), 471–484. Google Scholar Beattie, R. C.,Kenworthy, O. T., & Luna, C. A. (2003). Immediate and short-term reliability of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions.International Journal of Audiology, 42(6), 348–354. Google Scholar Boege, P., & Janssen, T. (2002). Pure-tone threshold estimation from extrapolated distortion product otoacoustic emission I/O-functions in normal and cochlear hearing loss ears.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 111(4), 1810–1818. Google Scholar Dorn, P. A.,Piskorski, P.,Keefe, D. H.,Neely, S.T.,&Gorga, M.P. (1998). On the existence of an age/ threshold/frequency interaction in distortion product otoacoustic emissions.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 104(2Pt 1), 964–971. Google Scholar Ferrite, S., & Santana, V. (2005). Joint effects of smoking, noise exposure and age on hearing loss.Occupational Medicine, 55,48–53. Google Scholar Gorga, M. P.,Neely, S. T.,Dorn, P. A., & Hoover, B. M. (2003). Further efforts to predict pure-tone thresholds from distortion product otoacoustic emission input/ output functions.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 113(6), 3275–3284. Google Scholar Gorga, M. P.,Preissler, K.,Simmons, J.,Walker, L., & Hoover, B. (2001). Some issues relevant to establishing a universal newborn hearing screening program.Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 12(2), 101–112. Google Scholar Henderson, D.,Prasher, D.,Kopke, R.D., Salvi, R., & Hamernik, R. P. (2001). Noise induced hearing loss basic mechanisms, prevention and control.London: Noise Research Network Publications. Google Scholar Henderson, D.,Subramaniam, M., & Boettcher, F. A. (1993). Individual susceptibility to noise-induced hearing loss: An old topic revisited. Ear and Hearing, 14(3), 152–168. Google Scholar Kvaerner, K. J.,Engdahl, B.,Aursnes, J.,Arnesen, A. R., &Mair, I. W. (1996). Transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions. Helpful tool in the detection of pseudohypacusis.Scandinavian Audiology, 25(3), 173–177. Google Scholar Lapsley Miller, J. A.,Boege, P.,Marshall,L., & Jeng, P. S. (2004). Transient-evoked otoacoustic emission: Preliminary results for validity of TEOAEs implemented on Mimosa acoustics T2K measurement systems v3.1.3(Technical Report No. 1232). Groton, CT: Naval Submarine Medical Research Laboratory. Google Scholar Lapsley Miller, J. A.,Boege, P., Marshall,L., Shera, C., & Jeng, P. S. (2004). Stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions: Validity and reliability of SFOAEs implemented on Mimosa acoustics SFOAE measurement system v2.1.18(Technical Report No. 1231). Groton, CT: Naval Submarine Medical Research Laboratory. Google Scholar Lapsley Miller, J. A., & Marshall, L. (2001a). Hearing conservation programs of the future: What role will otoacoustic emissions play? Spectrum,( 18(1),1–6. Google Scholar Lapsley Miller, J. A., & Marshall, L. (2001b). Monitoring the effects of noise with otoacoustic emissions.Seminars in Hearing, 22(4), 393–403. CrossrefGoogle Scholar Lapsley Miller, J. A., & Marshall, L. (in press). Otoacoustic emissions as a preclinical measure of NIHL and susceptibility to NIHL.In M.S Robinette &T. J Glattke.(Eds.), Otoacoustic emissions: Clinical applications(3rd ed.). New York: Thieme. Google Scholar Lapsley Miller, J. A.,Marshall, L., & Heller, L. M. (2004). A longitudinal study of changes in evoked otoacoustic emissions and pure-tone thresholds as measured in a hearing conservation program.International Journal of Audiology, 43(6),307–322. Google Scholar Lapsley Miller, J. A.,Marshall, L.,Heller, L. M., & Hughes, L. M. (2005). Low-level otoacoustic emissions predict susceptibility to noise-induced hearing loss.Manuscript submitted for publication. Google Scholar Liberman, M. C.,Dodds, L. W., & Learson, D. A. (1986). Structure-function correlation in noise-damaged ears: A light and electron-microscopic study.In R. JD. SalviR. P. Henderson Hamernik, & V. Colletti (Eds.), Basic and applied aspects of noise-induced hearing loss(Vol. Ill, pp. 163–177). New York: Plenum Press. Google Scholar Lonsbury-Martin, B.,Martin, G. K v McCoy, M. J., & Whitehead, M. L. (1996). Testing otoacoustic emissions in newborns, infants, toddlers, and children.In S. E Gerber(Ed.), The handbook of pediatric audiology(pp. 173–205). Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press. Google Scholar Marshall, L., & Heller, L. M. (1998). Transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions as a measure of noise-induced threshold shift.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 41(6),1319–1334. ASHAWireGoogle Scholar McFadden, D. (1998). Sex differences in the auditory system.Developmental Neuropsychology, 14 (2/3), 261–298. Google Scholar Norton, S. J.,Gorga, M. P.,Widen, J. E.,Folsom, R. C.,Sininger, Y., Cone-Wesson, B., etal. (2000). Identification of neonatal hearing impairment: Summary and recommendations.Ear and Hearing, 21(5),529–535. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar Prieve, B. A. (2002). Otoacoustic emissions in neonatal hearing screening.In M. S Robinette & T. J Glattke (Eds.), Otoacoustic emissions: Clinical applications(2nd ed., pp. 348–374). New York: Thieme. Google Scholar Probst, R., Lonsbury-Martin, B. L., & Martin, G. K. (1991). A review of otoacoustic emissions.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 89(5),2027–2067. MedlineGoogle Scholar Quaranta, A.,Sallustio, V., & Quaranta,N. (2001). Noise induced hearing loss: Summary and perspectives.In D. D. HendersonR. PrasherD. R. Kopke Salvi, &R. P Hamernik(Eds.), Noise induced hearing loss basic mechanisms, prevention and control(pp. 539–557). London: Noise Research Network Publications. Google Scholar Shaffer, L. A.,Withnell, R. H.,Dhar, S.,Lilly, D. J.,Goodman, S. S., & Harmon, K. M. (2003). Sources and mechanisms of DPOAE generation: Implications for the prediction of auditory sensitivity.Ear and Hearing, 24(5),367–379. Google Scholar Shera, C. A. (2004). Mechanisms of mammalian otoacoustic emission and their implications for the clinical utility of otoacoustic emissions.Ear and Hearing, 25(2),86–97. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar Xu, Z. M., Van Cauwenberge, P.,Vinck, B., & De Vel, E. (1998). Sensitive detection of noise-induced damage in human subjects using transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions. Acta Oto-Rhino-Laryngologica Belgica, 52(1), 19–24. Google Scholar Zhou, X.-H., Obuchowski, N. A., & McClish, D. K. (2002). Statistical methods in diagnostic medicine.New York: Wiley-Interscience. Google Scholar Additional Resources FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 2 Issue 1 June 2006 Pages: 9-17 Get Permissions Add to your Mendeley library History Published in issue: Jun 1, 2006 Metrics Topicsasha-article-typesCopyright & PermissionsCopyright © 2006 American Speech-Language-Hearing AssociationPDF downloadLoading ...