We compare a suite of three-dimensional explosion calculations and stellar models incorporating advanced physics with observational constraints on the progenitor of Cassiopeia A. We consider binary and single stars from 16 to 40 M ☉ with a range of explosion energies and geometries. The parameter space allowed by observations of nitrogen-rich high-velocity ejecta, ejecta mass, compact remnant mass, and 44 Ti and 56 Ni abundances individually and as an ensemble is considered. A progenitor of 15-25 M ☉ that loses its hydrogen envelope to a binary interaction and undergoes an energetic explosion can match all the observational constraints.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Young et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: