RuO 2 /SnO 2 catalysts with 2, 5 and 10 % Ru loadings were prepared with calcined and uncalcined SnO 2 supports by the impregnation method. The catalysts were evaluated for CO and CH 4 oxidation and characterised by N 2 ‐BET, XRD, hydrogen temperature programmed reduction (H 2 ‐TPR), energy‐dispersive X‐ray spectroscopy scanning electron microscopy (EDS‐SEM) and thermogravimetric analysis differential scanning calorimetry (TGA‐DSC). Owing to the synergetic effect between RuO 2 and SnO 2 , all RuO 2 /SnO 2 catalysts are found to be much more active than pure SnO 2 and RuO 2 /Al 2 O 3 for both CO and CH 4 oxidation. For RuO 2 supported on uncalcined SnO 2 , H 2 ‐TPR and TGA‐DSC analysis revealed the formation of a new, less active compound between Sn and Ru that consumed active SnO 2 and RuO 2 , and could be detrimental to the synergism between RuO 2 and SnO 2 , and thus the activity of RuO 2 /SnO 2 catalytic system. As a consequence, it is much less active than RuO 2 supported on calcined SnO 2 . RuO 2 /SnO 2 catalysts are also very stable in the presence of water vapour, which gives them potential for application in after‐treatment processes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yu et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: