Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Basicities of a series of Cp'(2)Ru(2)(CO)(4) complexes were established by measuring the heats evolved (DeltaH(MHM)) when the complexes were protonated by CF(3)SO(3)H in 1,2-dichloroethane at 25.0 degrees C. Spectroscopic studies show that the protonation occurs at the metal-metal bond to form [Cp'(2)Ru(2)(CO)(4)(-H)](+)CF(3)SO(3)(-), in which all of the CO ligands are terminal. The basicities (-DeltaH(MHM)) increase with the Cp'(2) ligands in the following order: (C(5)Me(4)CF(3))(2) < (C(9)H(7))(2) < C(5)H(4)C(5)H(4) < C(5)H(4)CH(2)CH(2)C(5)H(4) < (C(5)H(5))(2) < (C(5)Me(5))(2) < C(5)H(4)CH(2)C(5)H(4). This trend can be understood in part by considering that more strongly donating Cp' ligands increase the basicity of the Ru-Ru bond. Another important factor is the CO-bridging or nonbridging form of each Cp'(2)Ru(2)(CO)(4) complex. A dimer with bridging CO groups is significantly less basic than another dimer with only terminal CO groups although the donor abilities of their Cp' ligands are nearly equal. The Ru-Ru bond in Cp(2)Ru(2)(CO)(4) is substantially more basic than the Ru in the related mononuclear CpRu(CO)(2)H. Molecular structures of [Cp(2)Ru(2)(CO)(4)(-H)](+)CF(3)SO(3)(-), [(C(5)H(4)CH(2)C(5)H(4))Ru(2)(CO)(4)(-H)](+)CF(3)SO(3)(-), and (C(5)H(4)CH(2)CH(2)C(5)H(4))Ru(2)(CO)(4) as determined by X-ray diffraction studies are also presented.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nataro et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: