Why the study?
What are the long-term survival and functional outcomes of patients requiring at least 7 days of ICU care after CABG surgery?
What are the long-term survival and functional outcomes of patients requiring at least 7 days of ICU care after CABG surgery?
More than half of patients requiring prolonged ICU care after CABG survive, with many achieving excellent long-term function, though severe early cardiac or neurologic dysfunction predicts poor outcomes.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether information available 1 week after surgery correlates with long-term function in patients who suffer major complications after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. DESIGN: An inception cohort study. SETTING: A 526-bed community teaching hospital. PATIENTS: All 67 patients who required at least 7 days of CT-ICU care following 2,751 consecutive CABG operations. MAIN OUTCOMES: Hospital survival, long-term survival, and functional ability at long-term follow-up. RESULTS: Forty-three patients survived hospitalization (64%), while 24 died 37 +/- 45 days (range, 7 to 190 days) after surgery. When 42 patients were surveyed 22 +/- 9 months after surgery, 21 of the survivors enjoyed excellent, independent function, 7 were moderately impaired but living at home, 6 were institutionalized with severe limitations, and 8 had died. Patients with very severe cardiac or neurologic dysfunction 1 week after surgery had an extremely poor outcome. When mechanical ventilation was required for causes other than primary failure of the respiratory system, long-term function and hospital survival were poor. Twelve of 14 patients with pulmonary complications survived hospitalization, and all 12 were alive at long-term follow-up. CONCLUSION: More than half of patients requiring 7 days or more of ICU treatment after CABG surgery survive, and many enjoy excellent long-term function. However, those with very severe cardiac or neurologic dysfunction 1 week after surgery have little chance for independent recovery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wahl et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: