The activity of plasmonic Au–TiO 2 catalysts for solar hydrogen production from H 2 O/MeOH mixtures was found to depend strongly on the support phase (anatase, rutile, brookite, or composites thereof) as well as on specific structural properties caused by the method of Au deposition (sol-immobilization, photodeposition, or deposition–precipitation). Structural and electronic rationale have been identified for this behavior. Using a combination of spectroscopic in situ techniques (EPR, XANES, and UV–vis spectroscopy), the formation of plasmonic Au particles from precursor species was monitored, and the charge-carrier separation and stabilization under photocatalytic conditions was explored in relation to H 2 evolution rates. By in situ EPR spectroscopy, it was directly shown that abundant surface vacancies and surface OH groups enhance the stabilization of separated electrons and holes, whereas the enrichment of Ti 3+ in the support lattice hampers an efficient electron transport. Under the given experimental conditions, these properties were most efficiently generated by depositing gold particles on anatase/rutile composites using the deposition–precipitation technique.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Priebe et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: