We demonstrate the replication of device patterns consisting of interdigital lines ∼50 nm wide on 100 nm pitch using 1.32 nm x rays at a mask-to-substrate gap of 2.72 μm. The exposure latitude exceeds the factor 2.3 at this gap. From the expression that relates gap, G, linewidth, W, and wavelength λ (i.e., G=αW2/λ), we obtain α=1.44, which is well beyond the predictions of previous theoretical analyses based on the Kirchhoff boundary conditions. We attribute this disparity to the fact that an x-ray absorber is a lossy dielectric, hundreds of wavelengths thick, and hence the Kirchhoff boundary conditions are not applicable.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Smith et al. (1991) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: