We present a comprehensive theoretical study of conventional superconductivity in cubic antiperovskites materials with composition XYZ 3 where X and Z are metals, and Y is H, B, C, N, O, and P. Our starting point are electron–phonon calculations for 397 materials performed with density-functional perturbation theory. While 43% of the materials are dynamically unstable, we discovered 16 compounds close to thermodynamic stability and with T c higher than 5 K. Using these results to train interpretable machine-learning models, leads us to predict a further 57 (thermodynamically unstable) materials with superconducting transition temperatures above 5 K, reaching a maximum of 17.8 K for PtHBe 3 . Furthermore, the models give us an understanding of the mechanism of superconductivity in antiperovskites. The combination of traditional approaches with interpretable machine learning turns out to be a very efficient methodology to study and systematize whole classes of materials and is easily extendable to other families of compounds or physical properties.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hoffmann et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: