Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The authors present the results of further calculations of cross sections for the vibrational relaxation process CO(n=1)+para-H 2 to CO(n=0)+para-H 2 in which: (i) an error in the long-range form of the potential of Poulsen has been corrected; (ii) the influence of extending the size of the para-H 2 rotational bases set is more fully investigated; and (iii) the effect of varying the magnitude of the energy defect, Delta E, of the near-resonance process CO(n=1)+H 2 (j=2) to CO(n=0)+H 2 (J=6)+ Delta E is assessed. Conclusions are drawn regarding the accuracy currently attainable in calculations of the rovibrational relaxation cross sections.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Baker et al. (1984) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: