New detailed MHD-shock model computations are carried out for "C-type" low-velocity shocks (LVSs) that propagate through the molecular interstellar medium. Unlike many other C-shock models that adopt a population of H 2 levels that is in thermal equilibrium (static limit) and a fixed ortho-H 2 /para-H 2 ratio (OPR), the present one assumes a level population that is, along with the OPR, in a stationary state. This modification is necessary because the OPR of preshock gas is probably smaller than 3, as has been verified in H 2 observations of NGC 2024. Ortho-para interconversions occur mainly through collisions of H 2 with H + , H + 3 , and H. The densities of H + and H + 3 are generally low in C-shocks. These species convert only a small fraction of para-H 2 into ortho-H 2 during the passage of the shock. However, proton exchange reactions are the principal process for shock speeds u s ≲ 15 km s -1 . At higher shock speeds, the OPR attains its equilibrium quickly through reactive H-H 2 collisions, owing to higher kinetic temperatures and atomic hydrogen abundances reached in the shocked gas. Ortho-para interconversions induced through H 2 interaction with dust grains and due to H 2 formation on dust were found to be too slow in LVSs. A grid of models is calculated for preshock densities of n H = 10 2 , 10 4 , and 10 6 cm -3 and shock speeds from u s = 10-30 km s -1 . It is demonstrated that the OPR attains 3 in regions of shocked gas only if u s ≳ 20 km s -1 for preshock densities ≲10 3 cm -3 , while u s ≳ 25 km s -1 is required for higher densities. The OPR remains less than 3 for shocks with smaller speeds and may not even deviate much from its initial value at the lowest shock speeds examined. We present H 2 line intensities assuming an OPR initial of unity and 3. They are compared with those computed with models in which the level population is in thermal equilibrium.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
R. Timmermann (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: