Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the psychometric properties of Short Form-36 (SF-36) as a health-related quality of life (HRQoL) measure in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs). METHODS: Patients fulfilling the EULAR/ACR classification criteria or with myositis-specific antibodies were enrolled from two clinical trials (Tocilizumab in Myositis and Abatacept in Myositis) and one prospective observational study. Data collection at 0, 3 and 6 months included all myositis core set measures (CSMs) including manual muscle testing-8 (MMT-8), and SF-36 summary scores and all eight subdomains including physical component summary score (PCS) and physical function. Test-retest reliability (Pearson correlation), validity (association with other valid measures) and responsiveness using clinically important difference (CID) and effect size were calculated. RESULTS: The study included 105 IIM patients (44% DM, 30% anti-synthetase syndrome, 18% PM, 8% necrotizing myopathy), with mean age: 52.3 years, 64% females and 85% White. HRQoL scores were significantly lower in IIM compared with the general population. All SF-36 domain scores were significantly lower in patients with active disease and muscle weakness. All SF-36 components demonstrated good test-retest reliability at 1 month (P < 0.001), with significant baseline and longitudinal associations with most myositis CSMs. Changes in MMT-8 strongly correlated with changes in PCS and physical domains. PCS illustrated significant and concordant change with 2016 ACR/EULAR myositis response criteria and physician/patient assessments of change, showing a large effect size. We present preliminary CIDs based on a cohort with minimal clinical change. CONCLUSION: SF-36 demonstrates good reliability, validity and responsiveness in IIM and should be utilized for assessing HRQoL in clinical practice and myositis trials.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Keret et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: