Key result
Stress perfusion CMR outperforms gated SPECT for diagnostic accuracy and specificity in detecting significant CAD.
Why the study?
The diagnostic performance of stress perfusion CMR compared with gated SPECT for detecting and excluding significant CAD was not established in a prospective multicenter trial.
Does stress perfusion CMR improve diagnostic accuracy for significant CAD compared to gated SPECT in adults with known or suspected CAD?
RCT (n=294)
Blinded core lab
Yes
Does stress perfusion CMR improve diagnostic accuracy for significant CAD compared to gated SPECT in adults with known or suspected CAD?
Stress perfusion CMR using gadobutrol provides superior diagnostic accuracy, specificity, and predictive values compared to gated SPECT for detecting significant coronary artery disease.
BACKGROUND: GadaCAD2 was 1 of 2 international, multicenter, prospective, Phase 3 clinical trials that led to U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval of gadobutrol to assess myocardial perfusion and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) in adults with known or suspected coronary artery disease (CAD). OBJECTIVES: A prespecified secondary objective was to determine if stress perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) was noninferior to single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) for detecting significant CAD and for excluding significant CAD. METHODS: Participants with known or suspected CAD underwent a research rest and stress perfusion CMR that was compared with a gated SPECT performed using standard clinical protocols. For CMR, adenosine or regadenoson served as vasodilators. The total dose of gadobutrol was 0.1 mmol/kg body weight. The standard of reference was a 70% stenosis defined by quantitative coronary angiography (QCA). A negative coronary computed tomography angiography could exclude CAD. Analysis was per patient. CMR, SPECT, and QCA were evaluated by independent central core lab readers blinded to clinical information. RESULTS: Participants were predominantly male (61.4% male; mean age 58.9 ± 10.2 years) and were recruited from the United States (75.0%), Australia (14.7%), Singapore (5.7%), and Canada (4.6%). The prevalence of significant CAD was 24.5% (n = 72 of 294). Stress perfusion CMR was statistically superior to gated SPECT for specificity (P = 0.002), area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (P < 0.001), accuracy (P = 0.003), positive predictive value (P < 0.001), and negative predictive value (P = 0.041). The sensitivity of CMR for a 70% QCA stenosis was noninferior and nonsuperior to gated SPECT. CONCLUSIONS: Vasodilator stress perfusion CMR, as performed with gadobutrol 0.1 mmol/kg body weight, had superior diagnostic accuracy for diagnosis and exclusion of significant CAD vs gated SPECT.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Arai et al. (2023) conducted an RCT in known or suspected coronary artery disease (n=294). Stress perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) with gadobutrol vs. Gated single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) was evaluated on Detection and exclusion of significant CAD (70% stenosis by QCA) (p=0.002 for specificity). Stress perfusion CMR with gadobutrol was superior to gated SPECT for specificity (P=0.002), accuracy (P=0.003), and AUC (P<0.001) in detecting significant coronary artery disease.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: