Key result
Stage I-II periodontitis was associated with significantly elevated salivary periostin (1,234.5 vs. 596.32 ng/mL; p=0.001) and TGF-β1 levels compared to healthy controls.
Why the study?
Identifying reliable, noninvasive biomarkers is essential for improving early detection and monitoring of periodontitis.
Cross-Sectional (n=60)
Absolute Event Rate: 1234.5% vs 596.32%
p-value: p=0.001
Salivary periostin and TGF-β1 levels are significantly elevated in early-stage periodontitis and may serve as noninvasive diagnostic biomarkers.
Salivary/GCF periostin and TGF-β1 may aid noninvasive detection of stage I-II periodontitis; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before clinical adoption.
Periodontitis is a chronic infectious disease characterized by the progressive destruction of tooth-supporting tissues. Identifying reliable, noninvasive biomarkers is essential for improving early detection and monitoring. This cross-sectional case‒control study evaluated clinical periodontal parameters and quantified periostin and transforming growth factor-beta 1 (TGF-β1) levels in the saliva and gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) of patients with stage I-II periodontitis and periodontally healthy controls. A total of 60 systemically healthy, nonsmoking participants aged 20-60 years were included (30 periodontitis patients and 30 periodontally healthy controls). Clinical periodontal parameters, including the plaque index, gingival index, probing depth, and clinical attachment level, were recorded. GCF and saliva samples were analyzed using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Compared with periodontally healthy controls, stage I-II periodontitis patients had significantly greater numbers of clinical periodontal parameters (p < 0.001). They also had elevated salivary periostin (1,234.5 ± 505.82 ng/mL vs. 596.32 ± 320.47 ng/mL; p = 0.001), GCF TGF-β1 (10.14 ± 4.44 pg/mL vs. 6.50 ± 3.13 pg/mL; p = 0.003), and salivary TGF-β1 (31.59 ± 7.69 pg/mL vs. 20.25 ± 9.48 pg/mL; p = 0.001) levels. GCF periostin levels did not significantly differ between the periodontitis group (311.3 ± 210.3 ng/mL) and the periodontally healthy control group (208.6 ± 147.6 ng/mL) (p = 0.092). These findings suggest that salivary periostin and TGF-β1, together with GCF TGF-β1, may serve as promising noninvasive biomarkers for the diagnosis and monitoring of early-stage periodontitis. Salivary periostin showed particularly strong discriminatory potential and may hold promise for future chairside diagnostic applications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
TURKAN et al. (2026) conducted a cross-sectional in Stage I-II periodontitis (n=60). Stage I-II periodontitis vs. Periodontally healthy controls was evaluated on Salivary periostin levels (ng/mL) (p=0.001). Stage I-II periodontitis was associated with significantly elevated salivary periostin (1,234.5 vs. 596.32 ng/mL; p=0.001) and TGF-β1 levels compared to healthy controls.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: