Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study compared the forage quality of F estulolium entries of festucoid ( H ykor) and loloid attributes ( F elopa and N orwegian candivars) with major cultivars of the parent species perennial ryegrass and meadow fescue, and with timothy. Forage NDF , i NDF , kd NDF and DDM were analysed at vegetative stage, early heading, heading and anthesis during spring growth ( SG ) and two subsequent regrowths over two production years at two locations in Norway. NDF and i NDF increased and kd NDF and DDM decreased with advancing maturity, mostly expressed in SG , with negative correlations between DDM and NDF and i NDF and ADL , and strong positive correlations with kd NDF . In SG , across years and locations, the content of NDF at heading stage was 30% higher and i NDF 400% higher in stems than in leaves, while stem kd NDF was about 50% of that in leaves. In general, timothy cv. G rindstad and F estulolium cv. H ykor had the highest NDF and iNDF and the lowest kd NDF values. L oloid entries of F estulolium were quite similar to perennial ryegrass, although the tetraploid entry proved better than the others with respect to forage quality. Regarding nutritive value, the festucoid and loloid types of F estulolium should be considered separate groups. The effect of year was more pronounced than that of location, for which the ranking of entries was quite similar. Loloid F estulolium is prone to winter damage, and, although it has higher nutritive value than the parent species, its use will depend on the conditions for winter survival.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Østrem et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: