Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Focusing on the strategically important Caspian region, this article demonstrates how commercial energy diplomacy – political support for foreign-investing businesses – is increasingly conducted at the European Union (EU) level. It explains why member states have delegated this role, despite a general hesitancy to co-operate in foreign energy policy and perceptions of a strong division between diplomacy-based and (EU-favoured) governance-based approaches to external energy policy. To explain this new role (and its limits), this article employs a functional–rationalist framework focusing on the structural demands of a more challenging international energy environment and EU-level supply factors (economies of scale, increased leverage and more neutral/less politicized position of the EU) that help respond to it. Overall, the article examines an important area of increasing EU foreign energy co-operation and demonstrates how energy governance and diplomacy are not necessarily competing approaches, but rather different tools for achieving a more secure investment climate for European companies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Edward Stoddard (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: