In this paper, we define mandatory treatment components as ‘treatment non-negotiables’ and suggest that the manner in which non-negotiables are set and implemented has a significant impact on therapeutic alliance and outcome in the eating disorders. Common non-negotiable difficulties are reviewed and a philosophy is provided that can be applied to all stages of treatment: non-negotiables need to have a sound rationale, be consistently implemented, not take the client by surprise, and maximize client autonomy. We do not believe that a given non-negotiable is ‘right’ or ‘wrong’, but rather that treatment non-negotiables are optimally developed in response to the client population, treatment setting, clinician values and beliefs about change, and client and clinician input and experience.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Geller et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: