Key result
Patients with acute heart failure had significantly higher serum syndecan-1 concentrations compared to controls with stable chronic heart failure (121.4 vs. 72.1 ng/mL; p=0.015).
Why the study?
Natriuretic peptides do not accurately reflect all pathophysiological mechanisms in acute HF, prompting interest in a multi-marker risk stratification approach including syndecan-1.
Does serum syndecan-1 level predict the diagnosis of acute heart failure and early organ dysfunction compared to stable chronic heart failure?
Observational (n=173)
No
Does serum syndecan-1 level predict the diagnosis of acute heart failure and early organ dysfunction compared to stable chronic heart failure?
Syndecan-1 is a promising biomarker for diagnosing acute heart failure and predicting early subclinical kidney and liver dysfunction.
(1) Background: Acute heart failure (HF) represents a complex clinical syndrome burdened by increased mortality and a high rate of systemic complications. Although natriuretic peptides (e.g., NT-proBNP) currently represent the diagnostic and prognostic gold standard in acute HF, those molecules do not accurately reflect all the pathophysiological mechanisms involved in the progression of this pathology when determined independently. Therefore, the current paradigm tends to focus on a multi-marker approach for the risk stratification of patients with acute HF. Syndecan-1 is a less studied biomarker in cardiovascular diseases; its assessment in patients with acute HF being potentially able to reflect the myocardial pathological changes, such as fibrosis, inflammation, endothelial dysfunction or global wall stress. (2) Methods: We conducted a single center prospective study that enrolled 173 patients (120 patients admitted for acute HF, compared to 53 controls with stable chronic HF). A complete standardized clinical, echocardiography and laboratory evaluation was performed at admission, including serum samples for the determination of syndecan-1 by the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) method. (3) Results: The serum concentration of syndecan-1 was significantly higher in patients with acute HF, compared to controls [121.4 (69.3–257.9) vs. 72.1 (41.4–135.8) ng/mL, p = 0.015]. Syndecan-1 was a significant predictor for the diagnosis of acute HF, expressed by an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.898, similar to NT-proBNP (AUC: 0.976) or cardiac troponin (AUC: 0.839). Moreover, syndecan-1 was independently associated with impaired kidney and liver function at admission, being also a predictor for early, subclinical organ dysfunction in patients with normal biological parameters at admission. When included in the multi-marker model, syndecan-1 levels influenced mortality more significantly than NT-proBNP or troponin. A multivariable regression including syndecan-1, NT-proBNP and troponin provided additional prognostic value compared to each independent biomarker. (4) Conclusions: Syndecan-1 can be considered a promising novel biomarker in acute HF, exhibiting adequate diagnostic and prognostic value. Additionally, syndecan-1 can be used as a surrogate biomarker for non-cardiac organ dysfunction, as its highs levels can accurately reflect early acute kidney and liver injury.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Miftode et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Acute heart failure (n=173). Acute heart failure vs. Stable chronic heart failure was evaluated on Serum concentration of syndecan-1 (ng/mL) (p=0.015). Patients with acute heart failure had significantly higher serum syndecan-1 concentrations compared to controls with stable chronic heart failure (121.4 vs. 72.1 ng/mL; p=0.015).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: