Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The afterglow of the gamma-ray burst (GRB) 000301C exhibited achromatic, short-timescale variability that is difficult to reconcile with the standard relativistic shock model. We interpret the observed light curves as a microlensing event superposed on power-law flux decays typical of afterglows. In general, a relativistic GRB shock appears on the sky as a thin ring expanding at a superluminal speed. Initially the ring is small relative to its angular separation from the lens, and so its flux is magnified by a constant factor. As the ring grows and sweeps across the lens, its magnification reaches a maximum. Subsequently, the flux gradually recovers its unlensed value. This behavior involves only three free parameters in its simplest formulation and was predicted theoretically by A. Loeb & R. Perna. Fitting the available R -band photometric data of GRB 000301C to a simple model of the microlensing event and a broken power law for the afterglow, we find reasonable values for all the parameters and a reduced χ 2 /degrees of freedom parameter of 1.48 compared with 2.99 for the broken power-law fit alone. The peak magnification of ~2 occurred 3.8 days after the burst. The entire optical to IR data imply a width of the GRB ring of order 10% of its radius, similar to theoretical expectations. The angular resolution provided by microlensing is better than a microarcsecond. We infer a mass of approximately 0.5 M ☉ for a lens located halfway to the source at z s = 2.04. A galaxy 2'' from GRB 000301C might be the host of the stellar lens, but current data provides only an upper limit on its surface brightness at the GRB position.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Garnavich et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: