Key result
Andexanet alfa was associated with a 3% rate of thrombotic events at 30 days compared to 13% with 4F-PCC in patients with major bleeding on factor Xa inhibitors.
Why the study?
Both andexanet alfa and 4F-PCC reversal strategies are linked to thrombotic events, but whether risk relates to the reversal agent or lack of anticoagulant re-initiation remained unclear.
What are the patterns of anticoagulation re-initiation and associated thrombotic risks following factor Xa inhibitor reversal with andexanet alfa or 4F-PCC in patients with major bleeding?
Cohort (n=57)
No
What are the patterns of anticoagulation re-initiation and associated thrombotic risks following factor Xa inhibitor reversal with andexanet alfa or 4F-PCC in patients with major bleeding?
Anticoagulation is restarted in about half of patients following factor Xa inhibitor reversal for major bleeding, and thrombotic events (7% at 30 days) occur exclusively during periods without anticoagulation.
May guide reversal agent selection in factor Xa inhibitor bleeding; leaves open need for randomized confirmation.
Both andexanet alfa and 4F-PCC reversal strategies have been associated with thrombotic events. It remains unclear whether the risk is associated with the reversal agent or the lack of re-initiation of anticoagulation. The aim of this study was to describe anticoagulant (AC) re-initiation patterns in patients presenting with major bleeding while on a FXai requiring reversal, and to describe associated post-reversal thrombotic events. This was a single-center retrospective cohort study. Patients were included if they received FXai reversal with andexanet alfa or 4F-PCC for major bleeding. Fifty-seven patients met inclusion criteria; of these patients, 34 received andexanet alfa and 23 patients received 4F-PCC. Most patients were prescribed AC for atrial fibrillation. The most common indications for reversal were intracranial hemorrhage 68%, followed by gastrointestinal bleeding 19%. AC was re-initiated at either prophylactic or therapeutic doses in 59% in the andexanet alfa recipients and 65% in the 4F-PCC recipients within 30 days. In those who restarted AC within 30 days, the median time to re-initiate AC was three days [IQR: 1–3]. Thrombotic events occurred in 3% of patients in the andexanet alfa group and 13% in the 4F-PCC group (7% overall rate). None were receiving anticoagulation at the time of the event. Anticoagulation was restarted in approximately half of the patients who received a reversal agent for a life-threatening bleed. The thrombotic risk was 7% at the 30 day follow up period. Continuous assessment of bleeding and thrombosis is important for post-reversal management of patients with major bleeding events.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hafiz et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Major bleeding while on a factor Xa inhibitor requiring reversal (n=57). Andexanet alfa vs. 4F-PCC was evaluated on Thrombotic events at 30 days. Andexanet alfa was associated with a 3% rate of thrombotic events at 30 days compared to 13% with 4F-PCC in patients with major bleeding on factor Xa inhibitors.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: