Key result
Surgical cases with Non-Routine Events (NREs) contained significantly more vital sign deviations and a greater proportion of time outside standard clinical ranges compared to routine cases.
Why the study?
Do surgical cases with Non-Routine Events (NREs) exhibit more vital sign deviations than routine cases?
Observational
Do surgical cases with Non-Routine Events (NREs) exhibit more vital sign deviations than routine cases?
Even routine surgical cases contain a surprisingly high incidence of vital sign deviations, highlighting the potential value of reviewing them for quality improvement.
NREs associate with more vital sign deviations in surgery; hypothesis-generating for monitoring strategies pending prospective validation.
It is important to understand the interactions among multiple factors affecting patient safety in the operating room. This paper describes data obtained using videotaped surgical cases that contained Non-Routine Events (NREs) versus Routine cases, as reported by anesthesia professionals. Random samples of videotapes were further analyzed for deviations of physiological parameters (vital signs) outside the accepted safe clinical range. The NRE cases contained significantly more vital sign deviations than routine cases. Additionally, vital signs were outside the standard clinical range a greater proportion of case time in NRE cases than in Routine cases. Nevertheless, there was a surprisingly high incidence of vital sign deviations during both types of cases. Such “routine” cases would otherwise not be reviewed or come under scrutiny in typical quality improvement efforts, even though they may contain valuable data about safety critical events.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Slagle et al. (2009) conducted an observational in Surgical cases under anesthesia. Non-Routine Events (NREs) vs. Routine cases was evaluated on Deviations of physiological parameters (vital signs) outside the accepted safe clinical range. Surgical cases with Non-Routine Events (NREs) contained significantly more vital sign deviations and a greater proportion of time outside standard clinical ranges compared to routine cases.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: