Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
), particularly the retention of its commercially valued golden ventral appearance. This study systematically compared room-temperature, water-bath, ultrasound-assisted, microwave, and high-voltage electrostatic field (HVEF) thawing using physicochemical analysis, texture measurement, sensory evaluation, H&E histology, LF-NMR/MRI, and HS-GC-IMS. Although HVEF was not the fastest treatment, it showed the best overall quality preservation, with lower thawing loss, higher moisture retention, lower MDA and TVB-N values, better texture preservation, and the highest overall sensory score. HVEF also better preserved muscle structure, stabilized water distribution, retained the characteristic ventral-skin color, and showed a more restrained volatile profile than ultrasound-assisted and microwave thawing. Taken together, these results indicate that HVEF provides the best overall balance between thawing efficiency and post-thaw quality retention, particularly for preserving the commercially important golden ventral appearance of large yellow croaker.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: