Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Psychological research on leadership has dealt mainly with the influence of leadership as an independent variable (Bass, 1990 Bass, B. M. 1990. Bass & Stogdills' handbook of leadership: Theory, research and management application, New York: Free Press. [Google Scholar]). Only recently has a pioneer attempt been made to develop an empirical model for the examination of motivation to lead (MTL; Chan, 1999 Chan, K. Y. 1999. Toward a theory of individual differences and leadership: Understanding the motivation to lead, Doctoral dissertation, Department of Psychology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.. [Google Scholar]). This model incorporates three factors: affective MTL, social-normative MTL, and calculative MTL. The study described here tested and expanded Chan's model with a sample from the Israel Defense Forces (IDF; n = 402). It confirms the existence of the three motivational factors located by Chan. Two additional motivational factors were found: ideological and patriotic. Also, leaders differed from non-leaders in their MTL factors. The theoretical and practical significance of these findings is discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Amit et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: