Specific ex vivo platelet aggregation tests tailored to a drug's mechanism of action can serve as effective surrogate markers for planning clinical trials of antiplatelet agents.
May guide surrogate selection in antiplatelet trial planning; leaves open prospective validation before clinical use.
Using acetylsalicylic acid-dipyridamole, a combined thromboxane receptor antagonist-thromboxane synthase inhibitor, and a fibrinogen receptor antagonist as examples, this article discusses the predictive value of several methods that may be employed in the evaluation of antiaggregatory effects and their suitability as surrogate markers for the planning of patient studies. Platelet aggregation in various ex vivo tests and the effects of drugs on these tests were investigated using platelet aggregation in platelet-rich plasma and in whole blood, and in thrombus formation on a thrombogenic surface. Drug-induced inhibition of platelet aggregation is based on the modulation of metabolic processes or interactions at the membrane-receptor level. These effects must be assessed by methods adapted specifically to each mode of action, for example, mediator synthesis inhibition (cyclooxygenase), thromboxane receptor antagonism-thromboxane synthase inhibition, or fibrinogen receptor blockade. Thus a combination of both general and specific methods adapted to the respective mode of action of the test substance can serve as surrogate markers of drug efficacy for the efficient planning of clinical trials.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Narjes et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: