To determine the value of direct dark-field microscopy for diagnosing enteritis due to Campylobacter fetus subsp. jejuni, we examined 1,377 human fecal specimens for bacteria with typical Campylobacter darting motility, leukocytes, and erythrocytes. Eighty-four specimens (6.1%) grew C.fetus subsp. jejuni. Of the 48 specimens showing Campylobacter motility, 30 (62%) grew C. fetus subsp. jejuni. The sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value of observing Campylobacter motility were 36%, 99%, and 62%, respectively. The predictive value of detecting Campylobacter motility was improved if the specimens were diarrheal (23 of 31, 74%), leukocytes were present (25 of 33, 76%), erythrocytes were present (22 of 27, 81%), or if all of the above findings were present (18 of 20, 90%). The sensitivity of detecting Campylobacter darting motility was highest if specimens were examined within 2 h of arrival in the laboratory (15 of 30, 50%) as opposed to after 2 h (15 of 53, 28%; P less than 0.01). Prompt dark-field microscopic examination of diarrheal stool specimens is valuable for the presumptive diagnosis of Campylobacter enteritis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Paisley et al. (1982) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: