Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Longitudinal study reveals high rates of spectacle independence with monocular peripheral presbyLASIK in presbyopia, suggesting effective restoration of reading and distance vision.
PURPOSE: To investigate monocular peripheral presbyLASIK on the non-dominant eye with distance-directed monofocal refractive surgery on the dominant eye in treating presbyopia. METHODS: One hundred three patients underwent treatment with a VISX S4 system and follow-up from 1.1 to 3.9 years (mean 27.4 months). Average patient age was 53.3 years. Preoperative refraction ranged from -9.75 to +2.75 diopters (D). Non-dominant eyes underwent peripheral presbyLASlK--an aspheric, pupil-size dependent LASIK to induce central corneal relative flattening and peripheral corneal relative steepening. Dominant eyes underwent monofocal refraction-based LASIK (75.8%), wavefront-guided LASIK, limbal relaxing incisions, or no treatment to optimize distance vision. RESULTS: At final follow-up, 91.3% (94/103) of all patients, 89% (25/28) of hyperopes, and 92% (69/75) of myopes reported complete spectacle independence and 7.8% (8/103) used spectacles for less than 1 hour per week. Distance unaided visual acuity was at least 20/20 in 67.9% (19/28) of hyperopes and 70.7% (53/75) of myopes, at least 20/20 at 80 cm in 85.7% (24/28) of hyperopes and 84% (63/75) of myopes, and at least 20/20 at 40 cm in 71.4% (20/28) of hyperopes and 65.3% (49/75) of myopes, PresbyLASIK increased overall higher order aberrations similarly to refraction-based LASIK for myopes but to a greater extent in hyperopic cases. PresbyLASIK WaveScan spherical equivalent refraction was stable in myopes but migrated an average +0.31 D in hyperopes over the follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: Monocular peripheral presbyLASIK is a valuable option for presbyopic patients considering refractive surgery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Epstein et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: