Aim: The article considers the time series case of the closing prices of the S&P500 index over the period from January 2020 to April 2021. The author selected the best ARMA(p,q)-GARCH(1,1) models with different forms of probability density functions. The errors of the forecasts generated both in terms of logarithmic returns and their variability were compared. Methodology: The study followed the Box-Jenkins procedure. Applying the information criterion the study considered the best among these models with normal, skewed Student’s t, generalised error and generalised hyperbolic distribution. Results: The author obtained the following representations: ARMA(2,0)-GARCH(1,1) and ARMA(0,2)-GARCH(1,1), with normal, skewed Student’s t and generalised error distribution. The assessment of forecast accuracy showed that in the case of conditional variance forecasts, the ARMA(2,0)GARCH(1,1) models with a normal distribution and a generalised error distribution were the best. The largest errors of conditional variance forecasts were generated by models with a skewed Student’s t-distribution. Implications and recommendations: It is worth extended the study to models based on the range of fluctuations (such as Range GARCH-RGARCH or Conditional Autoregressive Range Model-CARR). Originality/value: The author considered models with various probability density functions, showing that such diversity was important when looking for the best models in times of high volatility.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Damian Wiśniewski (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: