Key result
Baseline computed tomography angiography was strongly associated with an increased probability of a short hospital length of stay (≤2 days) among patients with low-risk pulmonary embolism (OR 4.8).
Why the study?
Increased hospital length of stay is an important cost driver in hospitalized low-risk pulmonary embolism patients, who benefit from abbreviated stays.
Cohort (n=1,918)
Yes
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In low-risk pulmonary embolism patients, baseline diagnostic imaging predicts shorter hospital stays, whereas biomarker testing and comorbidities predict longer stays.
BACKGROUND: Increased hospital length of stay is an important cost driver in hospitalized low-risk pulmonary embolism (LRPE) patients, who benefit from abbreviated hospital stays. We sought to measure length-of-stay-associated predictors among Veterans Health Administration LRPE patients. METHODS: Adult patients (aged ≥18 years) with ≥1 inpatient pulmonary embolism (PE) diagnosis (index date = discharge date) between 10/2011-06/2015 and continuous enrollment for ≥12 months pre- and 3 months post-index were included. PE patients with simplified Pulmonary Embolism Stratification Index score 0 were considered low risk; all others were considered high risk. LRPE patients were further stratified into short (≤2 days) and long length of stay cohorts. Logistic regression was used to identify predictors of length of stay among low-risk patients. RESULTS: Among 6746 patients, 1918 were low-risk (28.4%), of which 688 (35.9%) had short and 1230 (64.1%) had long length of stay. LRPE patients with computed tomography angiography (Odds ratio [OR]: 4.8, 95% Confidence interval [CI]: 3.82-5.97), lung ventilation/perfusion scan (OR: 3.8, 95% CI: 1.86-7.76), or venous Doppler ultrasound (OR: 1.4, 95% CI: 1.08-1.86) at baseline had an increased probability of short length of stay. Those with troponin I (OR: 0.7, 95% CI: 0.54-0.86) or natriuretic peptide testing (OR: 0.7, 95% CI: 0.57-0.90), or more comorbidities at baseline, were less likely to have short length of stay. CONCLUSION: Understanding the predictors of length of stay can help providers deliver efficient treatment and improve patient outcomes which potentially reduces the length of stay, thereby reducing the overall burden in LRPE patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2019) conducted a cohort in Low-risk Pulmonary Embolism (n=1,918). Computed tomography angiography at baseline vs. No computed tomography angiography at baseline was evaluated on Short hospital length of stay (≤2 days) (OR 4.8, 95% CI 3.82-5.97). Baseline computed tomography angiography was strongly associated with an increased probability of a short hospital length of stay (≤2 days) among patients with low-risk pulmonary embolism (OR 4.8).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: