Key result
Knowledge about venous thromboembolism and anticoagulation was suboptimal and did not differ significantly between patients taking NOACs and those taking VKAs (64.1% vs 63.9% correct responses, P=0.7).
Why the study?
Does a personalized educational intervention improve knowledge of VTE and anticoagulation therapy in patients with a history of VTE?
Cross-Sectional (n=273)
No
Does a personalized educational intervention improve knowledge of VTE and anticoagulation therapy in patients with a history of VTE?
Absolute Event Rate: 64.1% vs 63.9%
p-value: p=0.7
Knowledge regarding VTE and anticoagulation therapy is suboptimal among patients on oral anticoagulants, but can be significantly improved with a brief, personalized educational intervention using a targeted questionnaire.
INTRODUCTION The current awareness of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and knowledge of thromboprophylaxis among patients receiving oral anticoagulation therapy (OAC) are insufficient. OBJECTIVES We sought to develop and evaluate the usefulness of the Jessa AF Knowledge Questionnaire (JAKQ), modified for VTE patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS Consecutive patients at least 1 month since the VTE event (n = 273, mean [SD] age, 51 [17] years; 52.7%, women; 55.9%, unprovoked event) were enrolled to the study. RESULTS The median percentage of correct responses was 64.2% (interquartile range, 53%-73%; minimum, 12%; maximum, 100%). Younger patients had better knowledge about VTE in general, including a higher proportion of correct responses to the question about the definition of PE (71.4% vs 57.7%, P = 0.03), about the possible consequence of DVT, including PE (81.1% vs 62%, P = 0.001) and VTE risk related to long travels (78.1% vs 59.2%, P = 0.002). There was no difference in overall scoring between patients taking new oral anticoagulants and those taking vitamin K antagonists (mean [SD], 64.1% [16.3%] vs 63.9% [13.8%], respectively, P = 0.7). Regardless of the type of anticoagulants, 39.3% of patients knew that VTE is not always symptomatic, 33.6% knew what to do when they missed an OAC dose, and 50% did not know which painkillers are the safest in combination with anticoagulants. Education applied in 27 patients resulted in an increase in the median percentage of correct responses from 60% to 80% (P = 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS Knowledge on VTE and anticoagulation is suboptimal among patients on VKA and NOACs. Education of VTE patients should be improved especially in older individuals on NOACs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Konieczyńska et al. (2018) conducted a cross-sectional in Venous thromboembolism (n=273). Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) vs. Vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) was evaluated on Mean percentage of correct responses on the JAKQ-VTE questionnaire (p=0.7). Knowledge about venous thromboembolism and anticoagulation was suboptimal and did not differ significantly between patients taking NOACs and those taking VKAs (64.1% vs 63.9% correct responses, P=0.7).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: