Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In a prospective, randomized study of femoral neck fracture operations, a newly developed compression-screw device was compared with the McLaughlin nail-plate. One hundred and twenty-eight fractures were treated with the compression screw and 127 with a nail plate. The patients were followed up for 3 years. All undisplaced fractures healed in both groups. Eleven per cent of displaced Garden 3 and 4 fractures did not heal in the compression-screw group compared to 25 per cent in the nail-plate group. Late segmental collapse occurred in 15 per cent of the healed displaced fractures in the compression-screw group, compared to 21 per cent in the nail-plate group. Fixation of femoral neck fractures using the new compression-screw device gave fewer failures without concomitant disadvantages compared to nail plate fixation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Svenningsen et al. (1984) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: