Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: Identical skin fluorescence can be obtained after one hour spraying with 0.5% liposome-encapsulated 5-ALA and after 0.5 hour application of 20% 5-ALA in a cream base. In this study the clinical outcome and side effects using the 0.5% 5-ALA in Caucasian skin are investigated and compared to earlier reported non-ablative treatments for wrinkles and improvements of skin texture using 20% ALA photodynamic photorejuvenation. METHODS AND MATERIALS: 37 healthy Caucasian female patients participated in a randomized, prospective split face study. Two different intense pulsed light (IPL) treatment modalities were investigated; both employed a pre-treatment of approximately one hour of spraying with 0.5% liposome encapsulated 5-ALA. One modality combined type I photorejuvenation with wrinkle reduction (C-PDT) using a waveband from 530 to 750 nm and short pulse durations (7 J/cm(2), 2 x 2.5 ms, delay 10 ms). The other modality (PDT alone) emitted a band of wavelengths from 400 to 720 nm, three passes were performed (3.5 J/cm(2), 30 ms pulse duration). RESULTS: After a series of three C-PDT or PDT-alone treatments, the patients obtained statistically significant (P< 5 x 10-5) reductions in periorbital and perioral wrinkles. Using the Fitzpatrick wrinkle scale, periorbital wrinkles were reduced by 1.2 grades (SD: 1.1) and 1.1 (SD: 1.1), respectively and perioral wrinkles were reduced by 0.8 grades (SD: 1.0) and 0.7 (SD: 0.9) respectively. The difference in treatment efficacy between. C-PDT and PDT alone treated sides was not statistically significant (P = 0.224). CONCLUSION: The present study shows that statistically significant improvements in wrinkle reduction and skin texture, equivalent to previously reported results obtained with 20% ALA, can be obtained with 0.5% liposome encapsulated 5-ALA. Only minor and infrequent side effects were registered at the 0.5% 5-ALA treated areas. Skin fluorescence monitoring during pre-treatrnent with 5-ALA may improve clinical efficacy, reduce time consumption and increase safety of the treatment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bjerring et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: