Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Objective. To assess the diagnostic accuracy of a 2 mm microlaparoscope compared to the conventional 10 mm laparoscope. Design. A prospective study. Patients and methods. Fifty‐two patients underwent 2 mm and 10 mm laparoscopy in the same session. All procedures were videotaped and the quality of visualization for both methods was assessed by an independent investigator using a 3‐step grading scale. Results. Diagnostic information was found to be similar for both methods. Conclusion. In most cases undergoing laparoscopy for diagnostic purposes 2 mm microlaparoscopy yields sufficient information to abandon the conventional 10 mm technique. Fifty‐two patients were laparoscoped with the 2 mm and the 10 mm system in the same session. Diagnostic information was found to be similar for both methods. The present study demonstrated that in most cases 2 mm microlaparoscopy yields sufficient information to abandon the conventional 10 mm technique.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Haeusler et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: