? 1989 by Cornell University. 0001 -8392/89/3402-02 52/$1 .00. This paper explores several issues of distributive justice as they are represented in the thinking practices of managers. The particular focus is on the contrast between equityand parity-based distribution logics, how these are likely to be affected by different value contexts and by personal philosophies of managing, and how justice-related concerns fit into the way managers are likely to approach allocation problems. Empirical data gathered from a sample of practicing managers concerning their preferences and reactions to standardized allocation problems indicated that managers are flexible in their use of equityand parity-based logics and that their concerns about fairness are closely connected to other value considerations. The implications for a more expansive view of justice in the workplace are discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
James R. Meindl (1989) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: