Why the study?
Does ERG immunohistochemistry accurately detect TMRPSS2-ERG fusion compared to FISH in Egyptian patients with prostate cancer?
Does ERG immunohistochemistry accurately detect TMRPSS2-ERG fusion compared to FISH in Egyptian patients with prostate cancer?
This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
AIM: Prostate cancer (PCa) is the second most common cancers in men worldwide. Its incidence can be influenced by several risk factors including genetic susceptibility. Therefore the search for the expression of a certain gene (ERG) and its rearrangement could give us clues for proper identification of PCa. And the study of ERG expression and its comparison to FISH in Egyptian patients can show whether ERG immunophenotype could be used instead of FISH, as it is cheaper. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was performed on 85 cases of PCa, showing 30 cases with HGPIN and 30 cases of prostatic hyperplasia. All were immunohistochemistry stained using ERG monoclonal rabbit antihuman antibody was used (clone: EP111). FISH analysis was performed in 38 biopsies of PCa cases to detect TMRPSS2-ERG rearrangement using the FISH ZytoLight TriCheck Probe (SPEC TMRPSS2-ERG). RESULTS: ERG expression was found in 26% of PCa cases and 20% of HGPIN cases. FISH analysis showed fusion of 21 cases of PCa (out of 22 cases showing ERG immunoexpression). CONCLUSION: Our findings emphasise that only malignant and pre-malignant cells and not benign cells from the prostate stain positive. ERG expression may offer a simpler, accurate and less costly alternative for evaluation of ERG fusion status in PCa.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
ERG immunohistochemistry may offer a simpler, accurate, and less costly alternative to FISH for evaluating ERG fusion status in prostate cancer.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Abdelhady et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: